g'luck smoka and $pit
im a definately be voting on this one
congrats and good looks to both!
g'luck smoka and $pit
im a definately be voting on this one
congrats and good looks to both!
g'luck to both... should be dope
"Sound stuff out guys" - Barcotic
Originally Posted by Automatic.
Lol...like I knew that your edited vote didn't come in, I assumed you just forgot to put your vote in because I ended up doing the same thing a few weeks ago when Philly and Lay battled, plus there was two pages worth of votes so I guess that would make it pretty decisive despite the fact I was up 2 votes because I never got an explanation as to why Born would want to DQ California's vote but if he did then I would've DQed question guy's vote just to be a dick because everyone knew he was going to vote against me...I can't help it if no one else voted by closing time for the battles...and the only reason Philly and Lay's battle from the week before stayed open longer is because it only had 1 shitty vote by the time it was time to close the battles...me and Born had 9 total votes by the time it was time to close battles..
get the fuck over it
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
i was gonna vote for
aha i won't tell!
fool you was all over that shit Auto said till I merked it, go sit in the corner
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
i was hoping u wouldn't catch that you fuckung fuck!
I'm not accusing u smoka i'm just saying it's very shady. If this was just a normal match I would understand closing the battle at closing time, but that was the semi-finals. I'd expect someone to be a clear winner before they advance. 9 votes is not a lot.. people vote more than that in FL battles and week by week LLL battles. Imo someone should be up 3-5 votes before a playoff battle should be closed.
lol, no...that idea doesn't apply to anything on this site or anything in real life...there's a timetable for everything...
FL battles close at whoever gets 5 votes first...do you think they reopen for more votes if the other guy gets 4?? no...and just because it's your opinion doesn't validate that it should be reopened....Lay said I won and me and him have had LOTS of back and forths this season....boxing matches end after a certain number of rounds...they don't go and add another round if they thought it was close....a baseball game has 9 innings...and if one team is winning by at least 1 point the game ends after that inning ends...football games end in the 4th quarter barring a tie....your big assignment for work is due in 3 days...no matter what...
it don't matter how close it was....what matters is that there were plenty of votes and by the time it was time to close the battle then that's it...it's done....Marv kept saying he was gonna vote, and never did...Com said he would vote, and never did....and you voted but just never made clear who you voted for until NOW when it's 2 days too late..that ain't my fault my dude...so don't point the finger like it is..you should've made your vote complete when you voted because it was clear by your breakdown whose verse you favored anyway
Last edited by SmokaJoka; November 7th, 2007 at 02:06 PM
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
dude ur being way too defensive, like i said i'm just telling u how it seems shady. i'm sure lots of people agree with me.
that's because you have no point....there's nothing shady about closing a battle on time when there was plenty of time for people to vote and there was plenty of votes in that battle...
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
earlier this playoffs you said you didn't want to close any battle without a clear winner... 1 vote up is not a clear winner... that is what is shady!
I was up by two votes when the battle was closed...there was no validation as to why Born would've wanted California's vote DQed
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
AI
well I was coo enough to count question guy's vote...so like I said earlier...if Born would've wanted to DQ that guys vote, then I would've been dickhead enough to go back DQ question's vote...still putting me up by two
I mean that's just the way it is....California has no known beef with Born, and I barely know the dude...so why would his vote be DQed? it's pretty obvious question guy doesn't like me and I still was gonna let his vote stand
To view links or images in signatures your post count must be 50 or greater. You currently have 0 posts.
idk question is a pretty sound voter. even when he was obsessed with me so much that he hated me for not being him, he still voted for me.